There’s nothing the overlords of the u.s. enjoy more than promoting the great ‘racial’ divide. It’s the most intense form of hypocrisy in their repertoire.

They try to have it both ways: first they push the integrated ‘brotherhood of man’ concept – there is no distinction among races – when it suits their agenda, then they emphasize racial differences – ‘whites want to keep all other races down’ – when it suits another part of the agenda.

It’s the old ‘divide and conquer’ technique.

In 1863 Abraham Lincoln offered the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction. The History channel offers a quick description:

The proclamation addressed three main areas of concern. First, it allowed for a full pardon for and restoration of property to all engaged in the rebellion with the exception of the highest Confederate officials and military leaders. Second, it allowed for a new state government to be formed when 10 percent of the eligible voters had taken an oath of allegiance to the United States. Third, the Southern states admitted in this fashion were encouraged to enact plans to deal with the freed slaves so long as their freedom was not compromised.

In short, the terms of the plan were easy for most Southerners to accept.

Actually it was more than that. It was a plan that would allow a peaceful transition following the civil war conflict that tore the United States apart. It was a plan that allowed for a reconciliation of all the people in a more just and fair manner.

Unfortunately, with the assassination of the president, this proclamation was pretty much scraped by the radical republicans. The history channel suggests that this was because they ‘thought the plan was far too easy on the South’. But it was much more than that as well.

The oligarchs wanted complete ownership and control of the Southern resources. This was in fact the actual reason behind the entire conflict. Most honest historians recognize that the slavery issue was merely used as the popular pretext – that it was actually not the first priority. But this is beyond the scope of this post.

The point is that the post civil war era was one of treacherous horror for the South. After the war the ‘carpetbaggers’ moved in. In his unusual history of the modern world, Planet Rothschild – The forbidden history of the New World Order, M.S. King describes the situation quite accurately:

With [Lincoln’s] sudden death…a radical Jacobin-like faction of the Republican Party known as the Radical Republicans are free to abuse and punish the southern states for their attempt as succession.

During Reconstruction, many supporters of the Confederacy are banned from voting while newly freed slaves are given the right to vote before they can be educated. Smooth talking “carpetbaggers” from the North flooded the South, promising the ex-slaves “40 acres and a mule” in exchange for their votes.

Once in office, the carpetbaggers and their ex-slave allies raise heavy taxes on the conquered southerners. Criminal acts against southern citizens, as well as rapes of southern women, are common. In this atmosphere of oppressive occupation, Confederate Army veterans form a secret society known as the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). Klan members clad in white robes and hoods, serve as vigilante groups. They restore order, protect white women from being raped, lynch criminals, attack Radicals, and prevent ex-slaves from mob voting for carpetbaggers.

More than the Civil War itself, it it the vindictive oppression of the South during Reconstruction that will incite racial tensions and leave lasting scars that will take nearly a century to heal.

King is way too optimistic when he suggests that the ‘lasting scars’ were ever healed. The fact is that the heirs of the same entities that instigated the civil war have continued to utilize the same techniques of ‘divide and conquer’ to this day.

This actual history of the post war South is never related to the masses today. The KKK are presented as merely ‘white supremacist haters’ – the truth of why General Nathan Bedford Forrest, and his fellow war veterans, felt compelled to create the organization is completely left out of the ‘history’ books. Whites are shamed, and blacks are denied the truth that they too were manipulated into conflict by empty promises and acts contrary to their own best self interest.

Why is this relevant to this post?

Because it sets the stage for the main point: were it not for nefarious actors behind the scenes, the issue of race relations in the u.s. would probably not be as damaging as it is today. Particularly between whites and blacks.

There was indeed a ‘cooling off’ period post civil war – and this was primarily due to a racial ‘segregation’. There were definitely aspects of this segregation that were cruel to black citizens. These were issues that would inevitably have to be addressed. Shared public resources and spaces were of particularly crucial interest in this respect. Yet the choice of direction was brought to the fore beginning in the late 1950s.

The choices were fairly well embodied in these quotes from Malcolm X:

We reject segregation even more militantly than you say you do! We want separation, which is not the same! The Honorable Elijah Muhammad teaches us that segregation is when your life and liberty are controlled, regulated, by someone else. To segregate means to control. Segregation is that which is forced upon inferiors by superiors. But separation is that which is done voluntarily, by two equals – for the good of both!

We don’t go for segregation. We go for separation. Separation is when you have your own. You control your own economy; you control your own politics; you control your own society; you control your own everything.

What Malcolm X argued wasn’t for ‘de-segregation’, he was arguing for a separation where people would be able to pursue their own interests in their own particular ethnic ways. His arguments weren’t very far a distance from those of American Nazi Party leader, George Lincoln Rockwell. In fact, Rockwell and two fellow party members attended the Nation of Islam Summit in Washington, D.C. on 25 June 1961, Malcolm X being the main speaker. They were given front row seats and Rockwell was given speaking time to the crowd of 8000.

Today, many in the ‘mainstream’ press portray this event differently than what it was. Some attempt to depict it as an attempt by Rockwell to storm in and create conflict. When this doesn’t fly – because it’s against all reason – it’s then portrayed as the meeting of ‘antisemitic’ minds. It’s very rare to have the point made that Malcolm X and Rockwell shared an agreement that voluntary separation is ‘good for both’ – that people should be able to pursue their own interests in their own particular ways.

This was very different from the other option – the option that was imposed upon both whites and blacks: forced integration. When the u.s. government compelled this upon the people of the u.s. with force of arms it once again provoked the hostilities between both races that had emerged in the post civil war South.

And it was damaging to all. To make a simple illustration consider this ‘meme’ from the web:

What Happened?

American blacks, despite their having to face the ugly side of ‘segragation’, maintained a sense of dignity and honor pre-civil rights era. But it wasn’t this dignified people who took over the argument – it was led and paid for by a group of non-blacks altogether: the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). Consider this list of original founders:

  • Joel Spingarn
  • Arthur Spingarn (brother)
  • Julius Rosenthal
  • Henry Malkewitz
  • Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch
  • Lillian Wald
  • Kivie Kaplan
  • Nathan Margold
  • Jack Greenberg
  • Julian Mack
  • Henry Moskowitz
  • Herbert Hill
  • Louis Marshall
  • Rabbi David Saperstein
  • Rabbi Stephen Wise
  • Herbert Lehman
  • Arthur Sachs
  • Herbert Seligmann
  • Martha Gruening
  • Felix Frankfurter
  • Herman Lehman (brother of Herbert?)

Solar General’s point is one shared by many thinking people – both black and white:

The NAACP was so Jewish during its first 66 years that that feature is almost unbelievable. Indeed, the NAACP had only Jewish presidents until 1975. Jewish involvement in the Black civil-rights movement had nothing to do with “ending racial discrimination,” or with their love of Black people. It had everything to do with making America less “White”…

There’s also another side to the story. From Dr. Ridgely A. Mu’min Muhammad in 2011:

This [“non-economic liberalism” developed by the longtime Jewish president of the NAACP, Joel Spingarn] was in direct contrast to the economic and political empowerment goals of the Niagara Movement, which was supplanted by the historians write about the NAACP, they make you think that it was the direct outgrowth of the Niagara Movement, which was secretly started by 29 Black men, who stated in their 1905 Declaration of Principles that they “especially complain against the denial of equal opportunities to us in economic life; in the rural districts of the South this amounts to peonage and virtual slavery; all over the South it tends to crush labor and small business enterprises…” These Black men demonstrated that Black people in the South strove toward The Honorable Elijah Muhammad’s brand of economic independence. In fact, by 1910 Black people had acquired over 16 million acres of land, mostly in the South, but Black landownership steadily declined after the advent of the NAACP, as this organization made the northern cities safer for Black people, thus facilitating the Great Migration(s) out of the South.

Powerful Jewish forces used the NAACP to effectively change the social climate in the northern cities, which were opened up to the Blacks from the South, who in the “great migration” to the North left their farms behind to be the servants for the northern elite and their immigrant white factory owners from Europe. Southern white Jews had made their fortune off “sharecropped” cotton and a captured Black market in the South, and, having moved to the northern cities to set up their clothing factories, they brought their Black “virtual slaves” with them.

An important note regarding this quote: jews are not ‘white’…by their own admission – except when it helps them in their own cause:

'Fellow White'

But now we should get to u.s. politics today.

There are issues that again lessen the ‘racial divide’ between blacks and whites – but as usual they are ignored and silenced in the ‘mainstream press’.

A couple years back, during the holiday season, an incredible push began that promoted an unrelenting program for miscegenation. A plethora of adverts appeared on television depicting interracial couples and families – between blacks and whites. Of course the racially conscious white people questioned this bizarre campaign – but so too did a number of black people. The ‘WTF’s came from both sides – of course, attention was only given to those ‘evil white haters’. To point out that black people also took exception to this massive campaign didn’t fit the agenda. In fact, this entire event was never presented to the public at all.

Then we come to the issue of illegal immigration.

Most americans aren’t even aware than many black americans are just as concerned about this issue as white americans are. A quick example of this can be related with the almost laughable exchange between the absurdly ridiculous Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and former ICE director Thomas Homan. The following video went viral:

The next video was presented by YouTuber, The Amazing Lucas. For people who don’t know him, this is his ‘about’ description:

I cover everything from Gaming to Bodybuilding to Politics with a taste for justice and common sense. Hardcore Spider-Man fan and competitive bodybuilder. Be Amazing.

The video is Lucas’ analysis of the smackdown:

This is only one example that demonstrates it’s not only ‘white racist haters’ who understand that illegal immigration is not only a problem – it’s ILLEGAL.

Then there is another side to this.

On 18 July 2019 Campus Reform’s Cabot Phillips posted a video of an interesting project. He had traveled to Georgetown University to ask students about a president’s statements regarding illegal immigration and deportation. The statement reads:

We are a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous. That’s why over the past six years deportations of criminals are up 80 percent, and that’s why we’re going to keep focusing on threats to our security.

Philips wanted to know if students would think the quote was ‘racist’. ‘After being told the quote came from “a president,” students offered near-universal condemnation for it, as well as the policy of deporting criminals.’

What they didn’t know, was that the quote was taken from a 2014 immigration address from then president barak obama. This pretty much sums up the reaction:

“I think that policy comes from a place of white American nationalism,” one said, before another added, “Donald Trump has embraced this rhetoric of racism and xenophobia that’s not beneficial to our country at all.”

Their reactions when they found out the quote actually came from former president obama were almost laughable

Almost laughable – because it really isn’t.

This is an example of liberal racism – period. For anyone to be concerned about illegal immigration, one just has to be a ‘white supremacist hater’. None of these programmed racists could bring themselves to even realize what they had just demonstrated.

The larger issue is the ‘racial divide’.

When Philips presented his results on Fox News’, Fox & Friends he made a very solid point: that while people could pretty much agree with obama’s statement just five years ago, he found it interesting ‘how quickly the left has radicalized on immigration.’ And it’s the same forces that radicalized the white and black issue post-civil war and renewed it relentlessly since the ‘civil rights’ movement that began in the late 1950s. It’s also not surprising that the big push for illegal immigration is being promoted by liberals/communists and those of non-black/white ethnic groups.

The more thoughtful blacks are realizing that this foreign invasion is affecting their own interests just as much as thoughtful whites are.

But again, this won’t be noted in the ‘mainstream’ media – because it’s an issue that could very well close that great ‘racial divide’…and possibly present a moment for both black and white americans to work on a common interest that might lead to others.

The history of ‘racism’ in the u.s. is written by those who invented it – and they’re the ones who have used it as a weapon for a very long time. A weapon that has created ‘hate’ where there otherwise might never have been any.

Perhaps both black and white americans will soon realize this – before it truly is too late.