Editor’s Note: The following post was published at AntiWar.com. FFP would like to add this note:
Here is a full list of the 72 Democratic and Republican House members visiting Israel with AIPAC:
Democrats: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (MD), Caucus Chair Hakeem Jeffries (NY), Reps. Ron Kind (WI), Ted Deutch (FL), John Garamendi (CA), Brad Schneider (IL), Vincente Gonzalez (TX), Jamie Raskin (MD), Jimmy Gomez (CA), Colin Allred (TX), Ed Case (HI), Sean Casten (IL), Gil Cisneros (CA), Sharice Davids (KS), Madeleine Dean (PA), Antonio Delgado (NY), Sylvia Garcia (TX), Jared Golden (ME), Jahana Hayes (CT), Kendra Horn (OK), Steven Horsford (NV), Chrissy Houlahan (PA), Andy Kim (NJ), Mike Levin (CA), Tom Malinowski (NJ), Ben McAdams (UT), Lucy McBath (GA), Joseph Morelle (NY), Joe Neguse (CO), Lizzie Fletcher (TX), Chris Pappas (NH), Max Rose (NY), Harley Rouda (CA), Kim Schrier (WA), Donna Shalala (FL), Greg Stanton (AZ), Haley Stevens (MI), Xochitl Torres-Small (NM), Lori Trahan (MA), David Trone (MA), Susan Wild (PA).
Republican: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (CA); Reps. Alex Mooney (WV), Troy Balderson (OH), Elise Stefanik (NY), Michael Cloud (TX), John Curtis (UT), Ron Estes (KS), Debbie Lesko (AZ), Clay Higgins (LA), Ralph Norman (SC), Kelly Armstrong (ND), Jim Baird (IN), Ben Cline (VA), Anthony Gonzalez (OH), Lance Gooden (TX), Mark Green (TN), Dan Meuser (PA), Carol Miller (WV), Greg Pence (IN), Guy Reschenthaler (PA), Denver Riggleman (VA), John Rose (TN), Chip Roy (TX), Ross Spano (FL), Pete Stauber (MN), Bryan Steil (WI), Van Taylor (TX), William Timmons (SC), Michael Waltz (FL), Steve Watkins (KS), Ron Wright (TX).
The poll featured in the AntiWar.com post shows that 65.7% of respondents feel that the democrats visiting israel during the congressional recess should ‘return to their districts’ instead.
What should really stand out from this is that despite the ‘crisis’ environment in both Texas and Ohio – due to the recent ‘mass shootings’ – these congress-members decided to spend the recess in israel, rather than go to the states they supposedly represent. One would expect that concerned congress members would take the time to visit their state – the people, as well as law enforcement – to discuss the issue with them and show at least some kind of concern.
This shows where their priorities lie:
Vincente Gonzalez (D-TX), Colin Allred (D-TX), Sylvia Garcia (D-TX), Lizzie Fletcher (D-TX), Troy Balderson (R-OH), Michael Cloud (R-TX), Lance Gooden (R-TX), Anthony Gonzalez (R-OH), Chip Roy (R-TX), Ron Wright (R-TX).
Or could it be the sign of something else…?
Americans Oppose Israel Lobby Junkets
But longstanding capture of the IRS perpetuates conduits like AIEF
Seventy members of the U.S. Congress (16% of the total membership) are visiting Israel during recess. Most of the private funding for the junket arrives through an entity called the American Israel Education Foundation. AIEF officially formed as a “supporting organization of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee” (AIPAC) in 1988 and applied for tax exempt status in 1989.
AIEF formed to receive fully tax-deductible contributions for “educational purposes” that could then be funneled into AIPAC initiatives. AIPAC – then as now – is categorized by the IRS as a lobbying organization that can only receive non-deductible contributions. AIEF claimed in filings to the IRS that it would educate students and young professionals about the Middle East and pursue other educational endeavors with a bona fide social welfare purpose. There is nothing in its application for tax exempt status about junkets for politicians. Yet today AIEF funds AIPAC organized trips to Israel for members of Congress costing $10,000 or more per individual. AIPAC staffers organize and conduct the tours. Thanks to AIEF and a handful of similar groups, one out of every three privately funded congressional trips lands in Israel. A recent representative poll of 2,000 voting age Americans asked about the Democratic Party delegation to Israel reveals 65.7% opposed it and think representatives should instead return to their districts.
Poll: 41 House Democrats are now visiting Israel during the Congressional recess on a trip funded by a tax-exempt pro-Israel charity linked to the US Israel lobby group AIPAC.
Following the Jack Abramoff travel scandal, a 2007 law was intended to prevent registered lobbies like AIPAC from conducting such junkets. But like laws forbidding foreign aid to clandestine nuclear powers, regulating foreign agents, and combating espionage against the US, the lobbying law is completely ignored as applied to Israel and AIPAC.
One core question is how AIEF ever gained or maintains tax exempt IRS status given the divergence between its original claimed social welfare purpose and observable activities. One reason is the longstanding, mostly unreported, close relationship between the Israel lobby and the US Department of Treasury.
AIPAC and another related entity, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) were instrumental in creating the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. OTFI has been led exclusively by hard-core Zionists and functions as Israel’s office of boycott, divestment and sanctions.
The IRS has also long been a captive of Israel lobby activity. Under former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman the IRS gutted its own oversight of “Friends of Israel” charities shuffling billions of dollars offshore into illegal settlements. Over decades and despite lawsuits and persistent Freedom of Information Act Requests, the IRS still refuses to clarify its position on illegal settlements.
A close tie to the IRS is also the story of how the American Israel Education Foundation came into being. Although AEIF claims it “was created in 1990” it actually formed in September of 1988 and applied for tax-exempt status in April of 1989. AIEF’s application presented tightly argued reasons for why it should immediately – and forever after – be affirmed by the IRS as a tax-exempt educational charity. The IRS delivered a determination letter to AEIF in just four months. There was little chance for a conditional five year “probationary” period which is common for new entities with no track record. That is because of AIEF’s October 11, 1988 (PDF) seven-page justification for why it should receive tax exempt status. It was signed off and most likely entirely drafted by Milton Cherny who had worked as the technical advisor in charge of tax exempt rulings at the IRS National Office in Washington up until departing the IRS in September of 1988 to “begin” work on AIEF’s submission.
Despite well-documented complaint filings to the IRS that AIEF is a prohibited “sham…alter ego” organization of AIPAC, there is little chance the IRS will compare AIEF’s present day activities with its original tax exempt purpose. Likewise for yet another official IRS complaint about AIPAC’s own failure to mention in its 1967 application for tax exempt status that it was formerly an unincorporated lobbying division of an umbrella organization ordered to register as the foreign agent of Israel by the Department of Justice in 1962. In the 1960s IRS Commissioner Mortimer Caplin, a longtime Israel booster, delayed and finally brushed off a 1963 Senate Foreign Relations Committee demand for the review of Israel lobby entity tax exempt status.
Today in an America where key federal and even state agencies are under increasingly intense levels of capture by Israel and its US lobby, warranted accountability and compliance with regulations rigorously enforced on most other taxpayers simply does not exist.
Grant F. Smith is the director of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy in Washington and the author of the 2016 book, Big Israel: How Israel’s Lobby moves America now available as an audiobook. IRmep is co-sponsor of the annual The Israel Lobby & American Policy Conference at the National Press Club.